Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04665
Original file (BC 2013 04665.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04665
						COUNSEL: NONE
	 					HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

He be retroactively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant 
(SSgt, E-5) effective Jul 13.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His unit did not comply with AFI 36-2301, Developmental 
Education, and failed to schedule him for Airman Leadership 
School (ALS) attendance.  

He was in a Priority 3 status, selected for promotion to the 
grade of SSgt and scheduled for a Temporary Duty (TDY) for more 
than 90 days, but was not scheduled for ALS attendance.  As a 
result, his promotion was placed in a withhold status.

He was told that he was not scheduled for ALS because he was 
planning to separate.  However, AFI 36-2301 does not include 
reenlistment intention as a factor for ALS attendance.  

He submitted an Inspector General (IG) complaint.  

In support of his request, he provides a copy of AF Form 102, 
Inspector General Personal and Fraud, Waste and Abuse Complaint 
Registration; IG Report and Memorandums for Record (MFR).

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments is at 
Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 17 Mar 09, the applicant entered active duty.

In Aug 12, he was selected for promotion to the grade of SSgt.  
According to a letter from his Unit Deployment Manager (UDM) 
dated 24 Jul 13, he was tasked for a deployment on 14 Aug 12.      

In May 13, he deployed for 90 days.


In a letter dated 2 Aug 13, the Air Force Material Command 
(AFMC) IGQ informed the applicant his case was transferred back 
to his wing IG for them to assist him with the appropriate 
referrals to help ensure corrective measures are taken to 
prevent a similar situation from happening to someone else.  
Further, the applicant was provided with a Point of Contact 
(POC) at AFPC who could assist with information regarding an 
“exception to policy” for promotion to the grade of SSgt without 
attending ALS.  

In a letter dated 6 Aug 13, the 96th Test Wing IG advised the 
applicant that they examined the validity of his unit’s efforts 
to secure an ALS slot for him post-deployment and researched the 
retainability he would have needed to attend ALS without 
extending or reenlisting.  In this context there was no AFI 
violation.  

On 16 Nov 13, he was honorably released from active duty in the 
grade of Senior Airman (SrA, E-4).

He served 4 years and 8 months on active duty. 

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial.  DPSOE states that he has not met 
all of the requirements for promotion to the grade of SSgt.  AFI 
36-2502, Airman Promotion/Demotion Programs, paragraph 1.11, 
states airmen selected for promotion to the grade of SSgt must 
complete in-residence Professional Military Education (PME) 
before assuming the grade.  The Military Personnel Data System 
(MilPDS) automatically withholds the promotion for those who do 
not complete the appropriate PME prior to the effective date.  
Once completed, airmen receive their original Date of Rank (DOR) 
and effective date of promotion (back pay).  Wing commanders or 
equivalent may defer PME for a maximum of 179 days for airmen 
who lack PME completion.  

A copy of the complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D.  

AF/A1DLE recommends approval.  The failure to complete ALS was 
not a result of his personal inaction but was the result of his 
unit not updating his attendance priority which severely limited 
his opportunity to attend an earlier ALS class date prior to his 
deployment.  He made several attempts to bring this oversight to 
the attention of his leadership but was unsuccessful in getting 
his priority updated.  Further, he was never considered for a 
waiver to preclude his promotion from being placed in withhold 
until ALS could be completed.  A complete process breakdown 
occurred in this instance and negatively impacted his promotion 
to the grade of SSgt.  


The complete A1DLE evaluation is at Exhibit E.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 24 Mar 14, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit F).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 

________________________________________________________________ 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.    

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  Having 
carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the 
recommendation of A1DLE and adopt the rationale expressed as the 
basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of 
either an error or an injustice.  Accordingly, we recommend the 
applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.   

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was 
promoted to the grade of Staff Sergeant (E-5) effective and with 
a date of rank of 1 Jul 13.  

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2013-04665 in Executive Session on 29 Jul 14, under the provisions 
of AFI 36-2603:

 , Panel Chair
 , Member
 , Member
       

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentation pertaining to Docket Number BC-2013-
04665 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Sep 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  SAF/IG Report, dated 13 Sep 13 (Withdrawn).
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 18 Nov 13.   
    Exhibit E.  Letter, AF/A1DLE, dated 10 Mar 14.
    Exhibit F.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Mar 14.


                                   
 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02531

    Original file (BC-2008-02531.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 July 2007, the applicant retired in the grade of TSgt after serving 20 years and 6 months on active duty, _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial. Furthermore, had the request for a waiver been approved, which would have been no more than a deferment requiring completion of PME within 179 days of pin-on, she would also have had to serve a two-year active duty service commitment in order to retire in that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01708

    Original file (BC 2014 01708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01708 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank listed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued 3 Dec 07, in Block 4a/b, Grade, Rate or Rank/Pay Grade, be changed to Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-5). His untimely application should be considered in the interest of justice because he received a form from the Physical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04168

    Original file (BC-2011-04168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 5 April 2005 to 4 October 2011. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03835

    Original file (BC-2012-03835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant failed to complete the required mandatory PME or receive an approved waiver prior to his 28 Jul 12 retirement. Airmen with approved waivers must attend PME, in the higher grade, within 179 days of their effective promotion date, or as soon as they are available without impacting the mission. The DD Form 214 will reflect the active duty grade the member held at time of separation/retirement and the retirement order will reflect the rank as "highest grade held on active...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04737

    Original file (BC-2012-04737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial, indicating the applicant became ineligible for promotion and did not hold the grade of senior master sergeant prior to her retirement. Wing commanders or equivalent have authority to grant or deny waivers of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00830

    Original file (BC-2004-00830.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    After a thorough review of the evidence of record, it is our opinion that since it is unclear as to why the applicant did not complete PME in a timely manner, reasonable doubt has been established as to whether the applicant did not attend PME through no fault of his own. Upon completion of Airman Leadership School, he be promoted to the grade of staff sergeant, effective and with a date of rank of his graduation date. Upon completion of Airman Leadership School, he be promoted to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00977

    Original file (BC-2004-00977.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was promoted to the grade of senior airman with an effective date and date of rank of 8 Jul 99. Based on information provided by the Air Force, he was selected for promotion to SSgt during cycle 00E5 (promotions effective Sep 00 - Aug 01). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, in accordance with the governing Air Force instructions, airmen selected for promotion to SSgt, MSgt or CMSgt must complete in-residence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01397

    Original file (BC-2008-01397.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01397 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was discharged in the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt), rather than senior airman (SrA); and that he was entitled to the Purple Heart, Bronze Star Medal with Valor (BSM w/V), Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02311

    Original file (BC-2007-02311.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02311 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her effective date of promotion to Staff Sergeant (SSgt) (23 Jul 04) be corrected to reflect her date of rank (DOR) (1 Nov 01) with retroactive promotion pay. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-02080

    Original file (BC-2008-02080.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02080 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, blocks 4a and 4b be changed to read Staff Sergeant (SSgt) and E5, respectively. However, he became ineligible for promotion when the Secretary of the Air Force...